Face
Cate Malek
Research Assistant, Conflict Research Consortium
University of Colorado
Based on a longer essay on Face by Sarah Rosenberg for the
Intractable Conflict Knowledge Base Project
Definition:
The familiar term is "saving face," which means not
humiliating others in public, or taking preventive actions so that you, yourself
will not be humiliated.
Users:
Anyone trying to negotiate or resolve a conflict, especially one in which the
potential for humiliation or embarrassment of one (or more) of the parties is
significant.
Description:
Face is understood as the image one projects of oneself or one's nation in a
public forum. Understanding face is vital to any conflict management process.
Sometimes disputants want so badly to save face that this overshadows all the
other issues in the conflict. Depending on the culture you are dealing with,
face has different levels of importance. In societies that highly value the
concepts of shame and honor, such as Korea, China, and Japan in Asia,
Middle-Eastern countries such as Egypt and Iran, and Latin American countries.
face is extremely important. People dislike confrontation, and often avoid
saying "no." Evasion and inaccuracy are preferred to keep appearances
pleasant. Being humiliated before the group can be a fate worse than death.
In Western, more individualistic societies, confrontation is seen as
acceptable, and does not necessarily reflect badly on the people involved.
Conflicts are seen as a natural part of life. If one commits a social blunder,
there is no group shame involved, only personal embarrassment. But such
embarrassment is still uncomfortable, and people still do not like to admit
mistakes, if they don't have to. So trying to find a way to solve a conflict
without emphasizing that one side or the other was wrong is often helpful for
conflict resolution.
Face-threatening acts will most likely lead to more of the same in any
culture. When face-threatening moves are deemed necessary, the chances for a
successful negotiation increase when there is a good balance of face-honoring
moves as well.
Examples:
One perspective on the Cuban missile crisis put forth by a leading researcher
on face theories, Stella Ting-Toomey, is that the negotiation came down to how
both sides could retreat to peaceful positions without losing face. The
correspondence between the two leaders (Kennedy and Khrushchev), shows they were
trying to figure out how they could both retain honor with each other and in the
international arena. Kennedy wrote about the seven lessons he learned during the
crisis, number six being, "Don't humiliate your opponent," which is a
central face issue.
Application:
Whenever a conflict puts one or more of the parties in danger of humiliation,
opponents should consider ways in which their needs can be met while allowing
the other side to save face.
Links to Related Articles:
Culture and Conflict
|